John Burwell Garvey, of Franklin Pierce Law Center and Anne F. Zinkin, of the New Hampshire Supreme Court have published a paper entitled, “Making Law Students Client-Ready: A New Model in Legal Education.” The primary focus of the paper is to detail the Daniel Webster Scholar Honors Program, which among other advantages, allows successful graduates to bypass the traditional bar exam before being admitted to practice in New Hampshire.
Click here to download the article from SSRN.
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | Comments Off on The Daniel Webster Scholar Honors Program
When in North Dartmouth (Massachusetts), go with the flow, and be creative. That’s what Carrie and Mary did today, Oct. 15, at their Best Practices presentation at Southern New England School of Law (SNESL). They adjusted to a colossal late-night technological glitch (Mary’s laptop crashing prior to sending Carrie the slides!) without a hitch (or at least without their audience noticing the hitch). None of us could tell that they had finished their preparation in the car on the way from Connecticut to North Dartmouth!
While there was a bit of “preaching to the converted” with Justine Dunlap’s and my presence, several participants had never heard of the BP movement in advance of the meeting, and others had only engaged with it once, a couple of summers ago at an informal gathering at my house. The level of participation was impressive, and included full-time faculty along with writing faculty, adjuncts, and graduate clinical fellows. In addition, the participants’ willingness to engage the presenters’ requests — by breaking-off into small groups to address questions Carrie and Mary assigned us – indicated, may I suggest, a willingness to work both individually and cooperatively to improve how we do what we do at SNESL. The questions Carrie and Mary asked us to address in our small groups included the following: (1) where people thought SNESL was, within the context of the BP movement, (2) what SNESL does well, and (3) where we can improve. What was encouraging, given that the group has on the whole been working together for many years, was the level of enthusiasm in the small groups; it was difficult for our leaders to get us to break out of the small groups and return to the larger group to share our findings. But when we did, there were some clear themes, which the presenters encouraged us to continue to address together throughout the year.
While I can’t judge the level of enthusiasm with which the participants approached the event, it was clear that, while it lasted nearly 2 hours, several participants would have stayed longer had the room not been overtaken by students coming in to take a midterm (which, our presenters noted, was a positive sign, given that assessments were being done at mid-semester!).
I’m writing at the end of this energizing day, before receiving the presenters’ feedback: a summary of both the responses to the small-group questions and anonymous responses we were encouraged to offer. It may, then, be too soon to judge whether we at SNESL will use today as our starting point for a serious commitment to the Best Practices Movement. But I do feel confident that, whether or not the group as a whole moves together into the Movement, some of us within the group will surely address our self-identified “could be improved” aspects (assessment being frequently mentioned) and, through that work, join with the Movement towards the future of legal education.
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | Comments Off on Carrie Kaas and Mary Lynch’s Best Practices Presentation, or NECESSITY IS THE MOTHER OF INVENTION
A few weeks ago, we were fortunate to host a group of educators who are interested in interdisciplinary collaborative education in the form of partnerships between law schools and the health professions at a conference held at Georgia State University College of Law. Antoinette Sedillo Lopez recently posted about collaborating with other departments in your university, which is a great place to start.
For those of us interested in partnering with the medical profession, however, the existence of a medical school within our university is not necessarily required. There is no doubt that collaborating with professors and students from different institutions can be challenging, but law schools are doing it in a number of different contexts. For example, our clinic is engaged in collaboration with both Emory University School of Medicine and Morehouse School of Medicine, to hold joint classes between law students and medical students and residents.
Even great distances have shown to be little deterrence to professionals who truly want to participate in interdisciplinary collaboration, as Liz Tobin Tyler of Roger Williams University School of Law can attest. Her law students commute approximately one hour to share a a classroom with students from Brown Medical School who are taking a seminar entitled, “Law, Medicine and Ethics.”
The learning benefits of interdisciplinary education have been described in different ways. The encouragement and inculcation of synthetic thinking, the holistic approach to client and patient care and the understanding that clients do not live in a vacuum, the creation of a new generation of creative problem-solving professionals, and improved outcomes for clients and patients are a few.
What does it mean to students? Consider these comments from one of my students, reflecting on her experiences sharing case rounds with residents and participating in patient rounds at a hospital:
Through each of these multi-disciplinary interactions, I form a more complete picture of how my clients’ illnesses affect their daily lives. I learn more about where my clients and their physicians are coming from. Most importantly, I am connected with resources that provide evidence to help legally establish medical conditions. Each of these things makes me better able to serve my clients. Medical educators and law professors should seek to promote multi-disciplinary interactions among their students as much as possible – patients, clients, students, and even the professors will benefit from such collaborations.
One conference participant shared that he initially did not believe that such a collaboration was possible because of the location of his law school and the absence of a medical school nearby. He confessed to asking himself, “Why do this?” After hearing about examples from other schools, he ended up asking, “Why not?”
Are there other ways that we can incorporate interdisciplinary experiences for ourselves or students to benefit our teaching and student learning?
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | 2 Comments »
As LOTR fans rejoice over the title of this post, law students everywhere should be encouraging the efforts of Erica Moeser whose goal is to enlist states to adopt a universal bar exam. I encourage everyone to take a look at the comments this post has received, here. Students clearly like this idea. Does a universal bar exam enjoy the same support among law professors? Please comment below.
The following is an article entitled “Erica Moeser: A Bar for All” originally posted at http://www.legalrebels.com/posts/erica_moeser by Stephanie Francis Ward.
Capture the energy of a border collie—that intelligent working breed known for nipping at cattle heels, almost pulling the herd ahead with an invisible string—and you’d get a sense of the spirit of Erica Moeser.
But her “herd” is a tough-to-direct bunch: She’s out to move the legal profession into a uniform, nationally accepted bar examination.
It was once seen as a radical idea, but Moeser, president of the National Conference of Bar Examiners, expects that six to 10 states will use the uniform examination in 2010, probably during July. The test is made up of three parts:
Test results would be figured into a portable score that participating states would honor.
“The big advantage, and the logical one, is it’s putting law in the same position as every other profession you can name,” she says in regard to licensing. “And the fact is a lot of law, like the rules of evidence, is common. … That lends itself to this sort of testing.”
The NCBE, based in Madison, Wis., developed the test, but participating states decide the minimum passing score. And if examiners include a test portion on their state laws, other states would not include that in the portable score.
The time to act is now, Moeser says. She mentions globalization in the profession, as well as a terrible job market that leaves many students unable to tell what state they’ll be working in when it’s time to sign up for bar exams and prep courses.
“The idea was premature two decades ago,” Moeser says. “What we’ve discovered is the further we move into making this a reality, the more the sea is parting for us.”
“She senses when there’s been support to move ahead and when there isn’t enough support … and whether there’s a middle ground,” says Chief Justice Gerald W. VandeWalle of the North Dakota Supreme Court, a past chair of the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar. “She can interpret a group that I belong to better than I can.”
Still, it hasn’t always been easy. Lawyers who work in attorney licensing agencies can be a maligned group, and the egos of some academics and the judiciary present other challenges.
“I’ve seen her in front of audiences where members are antagonistic, and she doesn’t snap back,” says Mary Kay Kane, a former dean of the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. “She respects the fact that people are snapping because they have a strong view, and she’s very good at not taking things personally.”
Kane is also a council member of the legal education section; and, like VandeWalle, she’s a member of the NCBE’s Special Committee on the Uniform Bar Examination.
When speaking about Moeser, Kane mentions her listening skills and how she uses others’ ears to help her. Moeser assembled a working group for the uniform bar, and as she spoke with different attorney regulation agencies, working group members were invited “not to lecture, but to listen,” Kane says. After the meetings, Moeser asked working group members what they thought of the agencies’ reactions rather than relying solely on her own assessment.
“Even those who are not sold on the idea—I’ve been absolutely delighted by their willingness to open up and have the conversation,” Moeser says.
Midwestern practicality also figures in with Moeser, though she grew up in New Orleans. She’s married to Dane County (Wis.) Circuit Judge Daniel R. Moeser. They have two sons who are both lawyers.
Moeser, 63, is a former director of the Board of Bar Examiners in Wisconsin (where the exam is waived for state law school graduates whose GPA in required courses meets a certain standard). She joined the NCBE in 1994 and started to think seriously about a uniform bar examination five years ago.
“There are some difficult nuts to crack,” she says, “but I never had any illusions that this could happen overnight.”
Filed under: Best Practices, Outcomes & Assessment Techniques, Catalysts For Change | 1 Comment »
Communication and Jounalism departments can help you with focus groups to get ideas from alumni and lawyers in your community about the skills and values students should learn in law school. Medical school models of assessment can be great sources for skills based assessment. University accreditation initiatives are likely to involve a review of assessment priorities. Other departments around campus may have structured assessment initiatives that good be helpful and be a source for terrific speakers. Co-teaching with someone from another department will enrich teachign expertise and assessment ideas. We have used these resources in the past at the law school.
My advice for tapping these resources is 1) get involved with different teaching and assessment initiatives developed at your university and 2) participate in projects wtih professors from other departments and then introduce teaching and assessment as a topic. 3) call professors you know are doing interesting and innovative things and invite them to lunch. Insights from other disciplines informed the Best Practices Book and there is nothing like continuing the learning with your colleagues from other departments.
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | Comments Off on Collaborating with Other Departments in the University
My colleague Mary Lynch asked me to share a project my bioethics students just completed.
I asked the 14 students in my Bioethics seminar to research the legal and ethical implications for Albany Law School of an H1N1 outbreak, and to work together to draft a memo outlining any policy changes the class would recommend to the Administration as a result of its research. The class worked on the project intensively for the better part of a week and a weekend. Although they had some disagreements, they reached consensus and drafted an impressive ten page memorandum that set forth the rationale for policy changes, the issues raised by a potential H1N1 outbreak, the applicable ethical and legal principles, and their recommendations on institutional responsibilities, attendance polices, isolation, school closures, vaccinations, and alternative means of instruction. They supported their recommendations with citations to the CDC, the state health department, the WHO, and other authoritative sources.
I was impressed enough with the students’ work product that I submitted their memo to the administration. The associate dean let the class know that the administration was persuaded by and grateful for the students’ input. She told the students that they should expect to see many of their recommendations incorporated into the school’s policy.
In reflecting on the project, the students noted how difficult but how satisfying collaborative work can be. They said they put many more hours into this assignment than they had other assignments — in large part because they felt their work might really make a difference.
Overall, I think the students learned a lot about public health ethics and policy drafting from the exercise. I’d love suggestions from blog readers about how to turn an exercise like this into a graded exercise. Given how much time the students put in, I think they should probably get more than class participation points for their work, but I worry about grading group projects.
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | 2 Comments »
In September of 2008, the ABA’s Council of the Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar Section (Council) began a comprehensive review of the ABA Standards and Rules of Procedure for the Approval of Law Schools relying on the work of the Standard’s Review Committee (SRC). On October 9th, 2009, at the last of its currently scheduled meetings, the Council’s Standards Review Committee will be considering a proposal of the Student Learning Outcomes Subcommittee . http://www.abanet.org/legaled/committees/comstandards.htm
It is worth a look at the ABA site to read the thoughtful and plentiful comments. The Council’s comprehensive review may result in significant changes in how law schools are assessed and “incentivized” (I abhor that word but if fits here). Cogent comments from Law Librarians, the Institute for Law Teaching & Learning, the AALS Clinical Section’s Clinical Skills Committee, CLEA and other individuals and organizations are listed .
On October 2nd, the Society of American Law Teachers (SALT) submitted comments in response to the proposal, noting SALT’s long support of a shift in accreditation standards that would result in law schools consciously focusing on their students’ acquisition of the knowledge, skills and values needed for the practice of law. SALT particularly applauded the inclusion of essential values and the references in proposed 302(a) (3) to a “lawyer’s ethical responsibility” for the quality and availability of justice and in 305 to “law as a public profession calling for performance of pro bono legal services and public service activities.”
Notably, on page 3 of the letter, SALT focuses on experiential learning and makes mention of the “important insights” of the Carnegie Report and Best Practices that “students learn best when they are performing real life lawyering tasks.” The letter also encourages the Committee to provide clear Interpretations which encourage schools to provide multiple experiential learning opportunities which are “well-supervised” and “designed to encourage reflection”
SALT’s letter is worth a read. It is a broad-based group of diverse professors who teach both experientially and non-experientially and cannot be dismissed as representing just one group of teachers within academia. Meanwhile, we wait to see how the Standards Review Committee responds on Friday.
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | 1 Comment »
During the past two weeks, many members of the Albany Law faculty engaged in a series of informal discussions about our teaching mission. After surveying faculty interest , the Center for Excellence in Law Teaching www.teachinglawstudents.com hosted small meetings of 5-10 members focused on selected topics. The intent was to stimulate conversation and unearth the collective teaching wisdom too rarely mined. Resource lists for each topic are provided before and at the meetings. The sessions end with a written “One Minute Paper” to provide feedback to the Center about future activities.
The first exchange focused on TEACHING DEVELOPMENT: Fostering Continued Skill Acquisition for New & Experienced Teachers. It provided a natural opportunity to bring together the newest of our members with our most senior colleagues. Facilitated by Professor Nancy Maurer, faculty members inquired about internal culture, the challenges that arise in and outside of the classroom, and collaborative opportunities. Lively discussion about teaching methods and engaged learning were examined over coffee, tea and scones.
The second exchange focused on OUTCOMES & ASSESSMENT: Formative (Feedback) and Summative (Grades) and was facilitated by Professor Kathe Klare, our Academic Success expert. The participants were a mix of teachers specializing in everything from constitutional law and jurisprudence to governement and land use, from securities to lawyering. The discussion centered on objectives, assessment methods, midterms, and rubrics. Questions were raised about the validity of grading class participation and the differing approaches to evaluating seminar papers.
Today’s exchange, faciliated by our Academic Dean Connie Mayer, was entitled “BEYOND LECTURE: Course Design, Active and Engaged Learning Methods and Activity Design v. Assessment Design. ” It focused specifically on how to engage in such methods in classes with large numbers of students. Teachers who employed methods such as small group work, role plays and practice exams exchanged syllabi, tips and pros & cons of attempted experiments.
Some faculty members found that the time spent on creating the problem activities for class were well worth the effort in future semesters. Professor Evelyn Tenenbaum discussed the need for appropriate case/problem books. She discussed her work with the Context and Practice Casebook series developed by Michael Hunter Schwartz and brought with her a copy of the first book in the series, Contracts. These books are intended to “guide students’ development of self-directed learning strategies; include questions that prompt readers to question, reflect, and analyze as they read; integrate self-regulated learning skills and exercises; and include teachers’ manuals that make it easy to use multiple methods of instruction and to emphasize active learning.”
Three thoughts occurred to me during these exchanges: 1) a number of my colleagues have been engaged in “best practices” long before more elite schools discovered them but we haven’t known how to capitalize or market the special worth of these teachers; 2) we do need better methods for warehousing and sharing faculty wisdom and materials; and 3) faculty members truly enjoyed the opportunity to discuss teaching with each other in a safe and supportive setting.
Our final Teaching Exchange scheduled for this coming Monday is entitled CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT: Outcomes, Learning Competencies, Progression & Capstones. It will move our discussion beyond our individual goals and methods to our collective ones. After that, we will see where the conversation leads us……
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | 2 Comments »
As a sequel to the June 16, 2009 blog “Collaboration Experiment,” I wanted to share a great experience one of my students had last semester. I teach a clinic at Albany Law School that handles unemployment insurance cases. We get referrals from a legal aid office under their Private Attorney Involvement initiative and early last semester, I was asked to train a volunteer attorney who offered to represent claimants (those denied benefits) in unemployment cases. Because of the high demand for representation by claimants and the low financial incentive for private attorneys to take these cases, I was pleased to agree to this task. Continue reading
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | 2 Comments »
The ABA Journal is conducting its annual survey to find the Top 100 legal blogs (blawgs). Please take a minute to vote for Best Practices! Your support is very much appreciated.
Thanks,
The Best Practices Bloggers
Filed under: Uncategorized | Comments Off on ABA Top 100 Blawgs
In 2007, CLEA published Best Practices for Legal Education, which articulated ways to effectively educate law students to leave law school better prepared to practice law responsibly, effectively and ethically. Since, then, Best Practices has been part of the collective conversation about reform in legal education, a conversation evidenced by list serve discussion, recent and upcoming conferences, and the larger curriculum reform discussions and innovations happening around the country.
Reviewing Best Practices can be Continue reading
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | Comments Off on Putting Best Practices Into Practice: Implementing Change One Step at a Time
Just back from a fantastic conference on assessment. Check out the great program, including materials and eventually video of the sessions (keep checking the site) http://www.law.du.edu/index.php/assessment-conference/program.
Noting the patting self on the back aspect of the following, I must say, we had a fantastic Best Practices Players session. Continue reading
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | 2 Comments »
[From The National Law Journal]
Emily Heller
September 7, 2009
Without summer associate programs to rely on, law students are turning to alternate ways of gaining practical experience and making connections that could lead to full-time employment.
Many students are doing externships to fill that need. They work, unpaid, for credit under the supervision of faculty and an on-site attorney at a government agency, nonprofit organization or sometimes a corporation. (By contrast, internships can be for credit or for pay.) American Bar Association rules prohibit law firm externships.
Once thought valuable but not essential, externships are gaining a new stature as students do everything they can to land a job. Continue reading
Filed under: Who is Using the Best Practices Book? | 5 Comments »
I’ve been thinking about ways of incorporating clinical experiences in doctrinal classes. The importance of this practice has not only been demonstrated by our Best Practices authors and the Carnegie Foundation, but especially by our own observations of our students as they enter clinical courses. To my mind it’s now obvious that students sitting in doctrinal classrooms for 1-2 years before getting involved in a clinical setting is not just unproductive, but counter-productive to their learning how to “be” lawyers. The way it is now, those who do enroll in clinics have little context for clients’ real legal problems, scant sense of what it means to gather the facts, and little notion as to how those facts fit with in the relevant law. Given this, I’ve recently suggested/mentioned to faculty at my school that they consider working on a “real” case in their doctrinal classes. The response was underwhelming. There was concern about additional work.
Has anyone out there been successful in encouraging non-clinical faculty to work with a group of students on direct case representation? If so, can you offer some suggestions as to how it might be made to work, especially how it might be accepted as a productive and enjoyable way to teach?
formative assessment.
Filed under: Best Practices & Curriculum, Teaching Methodology | 4 Comments »
 | Jim Wheaton on The Economic Value of Law Clin… |
| Could a purpose defi… on Implementation of the ABA’s Ne… | |
 | Kaci Bishop on Teaching Students the Art of G… |
 | Anne Gordon (Duke La… on Teaching Students the Art of G… |
| Defining lawyer comp… on Racial Inequity on the Bar… |
Best Practices for Legal Education 