Alternative Law School Ranking: Calculator of Law School Employment Stats

The “transparency” of law school employment statistics has been widely criticized and robustly discussed over the past few years,  resulting in changes to ABA accreditation rules and to law schools’ documentation and reporting of their graduates employment status.  Just last week, the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System (IAALS) http://iaals.du.edu/,  announced a new employment calculator intended to be used as an alternative to the traditional and, in the opinion of many,  biased current ranking system:

  Educating Tomorrow’s Lawyers, an initiative of IAALS, the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System at the University of Denver, is pleased to announce Law Jobs: By the Numbers™ (http://educatingtomorrowslawyers.du.edu/law-jobs), an interactive online tool that gives prospective law students the most transparent and complete law school employment rate information available.   

So what makes this calculator more transparent?  According to the website, it is an incredibly “powerful” tool because  “It lets the users create their own rates and, because we have made the formulas completely transparent and accessible, it teaches them how different criteria can impact the employment rates reported by schools, publications, and organizations.

If you click on it, you will notice that users can “choose their own” formulas such as  “whether bar passage is required, whether a position is full time, or whether a job is funded by the law school.” formula stands up against those from leading publications and organizations.  You can also choose to rank all schools or compare specific schools. 

I spent just a few moments on the calculator and found it to be very interesting and informative about employment parameters and about the type of information which goes into creating employment  “statistics, misleading statistics and outright lies’ (to paraphrase a famous quote).   I also believe that the more alternative information and evaluation sources available, the less power US NEWS has to lead legal education by the nose. And that, my friends, seems like a step forward!   

TED Talks Education on PBS – May 7th

Just got this email from Chris Anderson, TED Curator. Should be worthwhile for anyone interested in how to improve teaching and learning.

Dear TED community,

I am proud to announce that TED Talks Education, our first original televised event, premieres this Tuesday, May 7, on PBS stations across the US. It will be available globally on the PBS website starting May 8.

Hosted by John Legend, TED Talks Education asks how can we better inspire our students — and support our educators. TED, WNET, PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting teamed up for this brand-new one-hour special, launched in response to the high dropout rate in American schools.

TED Talks Education is an exhilarating night of new talks by Sir Ken Robinson, Geoffrey Canada, Bill Gates and some truly inspiring teachers. In fact, we’ve just posted the first of them today on TED.com. Rita Pierson, a teacher for 40 years, delivers a rousing call to educators to believe in their students and actually connect with them on a real, human, personal level.

Please set your DVR, and let your friends and colleagues know to watch on Tuesday, May 7, at 10/9c on PBS stations across the US (you can check local station listings at top right of this page) — and visit pbs.org/TEDTalksEd after Wednesday, May 8, to watch the whole show online. And we will be releasing most of the speakers as TED Talks from May 8-10 on our homepage.

Our intention was to create an authentic TED event, filmed in a way that makes it compelling television. We really think it worked. We hope you love it as much as we do.

My best,

Chris Anderson

TED Curator

Democratization of higher education

In March 2012 I delivered a talk at TEDxVillanovaU about The Future of Higher Education, in which I spoke about how online learning can bring about a democratization of higher education.  Renee Knake of Michigan State has taken the idea further and applies it to legal education in her forthcoming article, Democratizing Legal Education.  Elizabeth Chambliss talks about the article, here.  

What do you think?  It is possible to democratize information about law and legal systems?  What are the barriers?  Who will be the gatekeepers?  What groups would want to see it happen and would they be willing to fund it?

want some time saving tips — watch this video

This 6 minute TED Talk by David Pogue about 10 time-saving tech tips will save you more than 6 minutes over the course of the next few months (and it is funny too!).

ABA Task Force on the Future of Legal Education

The Task Force on the Future of Legal Education held a mini-conference on Wednesday.  Karen Sloan wrote an overview of the conference, ABA Struggles for Answers on Law School Reform.  An overview of the Task Force’s discussion items (from its Dec meeting) is available here.  That document focuses a lot on innovation.  Here is an excerpt:

Law Schools and Others in Legal Education Should Promote Innovation in Pedagogy

1. Law schools and law faculties should make use of knowledge and experience from other disciplines to support innovation in teaching methodologies.

2. Law schools should make use of technology in to innovate and improve pedagogy.

3. Law schools and law faculties should collaborate to facilitate innovation and improvement of pedagogy.

4. Bar admission authorities should recognize law school courses taught by innovative pedagogy.

A (long) video of the mini-conference is available here.

Flipped Learning for Legal Education

Hi Everyone! Mary just invited me to join this blogging community. Glad to be here.

For my first post, I’d like to think about how flipped or blended learning could be used in legal education. Flipped learning blends online and in-class instruction and has been used of late in lots of educational settings, including K-12 and undergrad. I think there is a place for it in legal education too.

The way I see it, flipping the classroom can take a lot of different forms.  I envision them along a spectrum, something like this –

At one end of the spectrum, it can be used to

1. Reinforce learning after class — professors can assign online videos for students to watch after class, to help clarify and/or reinforce the doctrinal concepts that were taught in class, and help to build students’ doctrinal knowledge.

2. Lay a foundation – professors could require students to watch videos that cover basic, foundational concepts – so classtime can start further along the learning process.

3. Supplement with different perspectives — Professors may also assign online videos (prepared by other professors) to supplement their own lectures, so that their students can hear different voices or perspectives on a particular topic or to have students hear from experts on topics beyond the professor’s own field of expertise.

4. Facilitate higher level Socratic dialogue – when professors assign videos for students to watch before class, students have time to think about and reflect on the lesson before arriving in the classroom. That way the videos may reinforce the concepts in the assigned reading and when students come into class – having heard the lesson on the reading before class — they will be ready and able to engage in a higher level of Socratic dialogue and discussion of assigned hypothetical and in-class problems.

5. Integrate essential lawyering skills — when online videos are assigned as homework, as a substitute for a professor’s own lecture — class time is freed up for more active learning exercises that incorporate some essential lawyering competencies.

6. Professor as Facilitators/Guides — Some professors may decide to use videos to help integrate practical lawyering skills in doctrinal courses. Students could be required to review videos on substantive law and on practical lawyering skills out of class. Then, classtime can be devoted to simulations or role plays in which the students use the material they learned on video to engage in essential lawyering skills – such as negotiations, interviews, or oral arguments.

In this way, the professor is moving from a position at the front of the class, to a coach who works one on one with students, or with small groups of students, during assigned classtimes. And it promotes collaboration and team building among students.

This last category would be at the other end of the spectrum and allow professors to bring more training in practical lawyering skills into each course.

What do you think?  Let me know if I’m missing something.  I am speaking about how to use technology in our teaching at the AALS Clinical Conference next week.  I’d love to hear your reaction to these ideas before then.

Upcoming Standards Review Committee Meeting

The Upcoming Standards Review Committee Meeting takes place on April 26 and April 27.

You can find a link to the proposed draft for review regarding Bar Passage here.

You can also find a link to the agenda for the meeting and other proposed materials here.

Please take a look when you have a chance, and let us know what you think! If you are attending this meeting, please let us know and leave a comment with an update to share anything you feel like passing along! We look forward to hearing your comments.

-Stephanie

ABA Panel Struggles for Answers on Law School Reform

Karen Sloan
The National Law Journal
04-24-2013

It turns out that if you ask 30 different law professors, practitioners, judges and bar association leaders how to fix legal education, you’ll get about 30 different answers.

The lack of consensus about what ails law schools and how to fix them was on display Wednesday during a daylong conference hosted by the American Bar Association’s Task Force on the Future of Education.

Participants in the forum struggled for agreement about what is driving the rising costs of legal education—or about how schools and regulators should respond to declining job prospects for new lawyers and flagging interest in law degrees.

“What the task force is doing is very difficult politically. It’s very difficult conceptually. And its very difficult pragmatically,” said Valparaiso University School of Law dean Jay Conison, the task force’s reporter.

The conference brought members of the year-old task force together with dozens of experts and interested parties in effort to guide the deliberations and help shape the task force’s recommendations. Though no clear direction emerged, panel members said the exchange of ideas was useful.

“Among the things the ABA is working on, this may be the most important,” said ABA president-elect James Silkenat. He told attendees that he is asked about the task force’s work whenever he meets with bar and law school leaders.

The task force hopes to release preliminary recommendations during the late summer or early fall, with a final report to follow in mid-November, said former Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Randall Shepard, its chairman. Members already have heard from several hundred people in public hearings and through written comments, he said.

The task force is considering what law schools, the ABA and groups that control bar admissions should do, said Loyola University Chicago School of Law dean David Yellen, a member of the panel.

The wide-ranging discussion,held at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law in Indianapolis, veered from whether to use the ABA’s law school accreditation standards to force change, to whether a law degree is even necessary for many of the emerging jobs in the legal industry.

The attendees also appeared to struggle with whether the task force’s mission lies with the needs of law schools, the larger profession or the broader society. When asked specifically what should be done, the responses fell across the board.

Some said law schools should be required to spell out the core competencies that students should develop at set points during their legal educations; others, that tuition reduction was the first priority. Several attendees endorsed higher teaching loads. No single idea dominated.

The ABA’s accreditation standards were a major focus. However, no consensus emerged about whether to relax the standards in order to give law schools more room to experiment with curricula, or to tighten them to force specific changes.

University of Pennsylvania Law School dean Michael Fitts and former Southwestern Law School dean Bryant Garth argued that any attempt to bear down would stifle innovation and ultimately prove counterproductive.

But loosening up seemed wrongheaded to task force member Jolene Yee, an attorney from Newport Beach, Calif. Too many people have urged the task force not to just tinker around the edges, she said.”I feel like we are at a critical place in the profession. I’m not sure [deregulating law schools] is enough.”

If a law degree isn’t necessary for every job in the legal industry, perhaps some schools will develop programs intended to train people for non-lawyer jobs within the legal industry, suggested Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Rebecca White Berch.

“What are law schools and what should they be doing?” Berch said. “There’s a tension between what I see as a broad education and the need for what I see as legal technicians. I don’t know that these people are lawyers at all.”

At several points throughout the day, panelists and task force members discussed the idea of a tiered system of legal education that students could exit at different levels depending on their career aspirations.

Any recommendations by the task force would require approval from the ABA’s House of Delegates, and there is still a lot of work to be done before a report is issued, Shepard said.

“The trail from here to the House of Delegates seems a long way to me,” he said.

Contact Karen Sloan at ksloan@alm.com. For more of The National Law Journal’s law school coverage, visit: http://www.facebook.com/NLJLawSchools.

Viewpoint: Happier Law Students, One Client at a Time

I’d like to ask you all to take a look at this article when you have a chance! It is an excellent post by Susan Rutberg, and I hope that you all take a few minutes to check it out!

Clinical Law Review Workshop – Registration deadline is June 30, 2013

The Clinical Law Review will hold its next Clinical Writers’ Workshop on Saturday, September 28, 2013, at NYU Law School.

The Workshop will provide an opportunity for clinical teachers who are writing about any subject (clinical pedagogy, substantive law, interdisciplinary analysis, empirical work, etc.) to meet with other clinicians writing on related topics to discuss their works-in-progress and brainstorm ideas for further development of their articles. Attendees will meet in small groups organized, to the extent possible, by the subject matter in which they are writing. Each group will “workshop” the draft of each member of the group.

Participation in the Workshop requires the submission of a paper because the workshop takes the form of small group sessions in which all members of the group comment on each other’s manuscripts. By June 30, all applicants will need to submit a mini-draft or prospectus, 3-5 pages in length, of the article they intend to present at the workshop. Full drafts of the articles will be due by September 1, 2013.

As in the previous Clinical Law Review Workshops, participants will not have to pay an admission or registration fee but participants will have to arrange and pay for their own travel and lodging. To assist those who wish to participate but who need assistance for travel and lodging, NYU Law School has committed to provide 10 scholarships of up to $750 per person to help pay for travel and lodging. The scholarships are designed for those clinical faculty who receive little or no travel support from their law schools and who otherwise would not be able to attend this conference without scholarship support. Applicants for scholarships will be asked to submit, with their 3-5 page prospectus, by June 30, a proposed budget for travel and lodging and a brief statement of why the scholarship would be helpful in supporting their attendance at this conference. The Board will review all scholarship applications and issue decisions about scholarships in early July. The scholarships are conditioned upon recipients’ meeting all requirements for workshop participation, including timely submission of drafts.

Information about the Workshop – including the Registration form, scholarship application form, and information for reserving hotel rooms – is available on-line at:

http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/clinicallawreview/CLRWorkshop2013/index.htm

If you have any comments or suggestions you would like to send us, we would be very happy to hear from you. Comments and suggestions should be sent to Randy Hertz at randy.hertz@nyu.edu.

— The Board of Editors of the Clinical Law Review

Turning a Billing Scandal Into a Learning Opportunity

The following post comes to us from Professor Benjamin Madison:

Many have read about the recent DLA Piper billing scandal; see http://storify.com/Edward_Stephen/dla-piper-billing-scandal-review (citing articles on the scandal, DLA Piper’s responses, and criticism of Piper’s responses). Unfortunately, the scandal will likely smear the legal profession more than it should. The results of the dispute between DL Piper and the client with whom it disputes the allegations it questions in this matter remains to be resolved. Assuming that DL Piper is exonerated completely, however, the damage to lawyers from the negative press has already occurred.

The practice of overbilling a client alleged in the Piper Scandal is most likely to occur in large firms with billable hour quotas. When lawyers face the demand to bill anywhere from 2,000 to 2,500 hours per year, they are certainly more vulnerable to the temptation to do unnecessary work, at the least, or to pad their bills with time not actually spent on the client, at worst. However, most lawyers do not work for large law firms. The ABA’s most recent study of lawyer demographics shows that a relatively small percentage of lawyers work in large law firms. See http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/marketresearch/PublicDocuments/lawyer_demographics_2011.authcheckdam.pdf. Lawyers in smaller firms, without the crushing hour quotas, are less likely to charge unfairly. Moreover, I know large firm lawyers who are scrupulous about the time that they bill. These lawyers resist the temptations resulting from billable hour quotas and manage to succeed anyway. How can we encourage law students to recognize the significance of careful time recording and ethical billing?

Legal education is moving toward educating lawyers to be “practice ready” and to have a sense of ethical responsibility. In this vein, we would do well to offer law students the opportunity to learn about billing. In my civil procedure and pretrial practice classes, I have students break into groups to work on projects—e.g., a plan for discovery in a simulated case, or jointly preparing a pleading, a motion, or some other document in the simulated case. When I have the groups do these projects, I now plan to assign them an hourly rate (say, $200 per hour) and tell the student “lawyers” that they must—independent of one another—keep track of the time they spend on the matter. I’ll explain that billable hours are often broken down into increments, such as most commonly a tenth of an hour (or six minutes). I will then have them multiply the time they record by their hourly rate. If the student spends fifteen minutes on the project, I’ll ask whether they will round up to three-tenths of an hour (i.e., 18 minutes) even though they did not spend that much time working for the client. If the student decides that’s fair, then she or he would bill $60.

The exercise should reveal some interesting results. If students keep time separately (as I will insist), my guess is that there will be discrepancies in the amount of time recorded. That will provide an opportunity to discuss the necessity to be careful in contemporaneous recording and developing the habit of recording precisely when one starts and finishes a project or task. Moreover, we can discuss the common practice of rounding up to the next tenth of an hour (the 18 minutes noted above). Although the practice is common, the professor can ask students whether they believe such a practice out to be spelled out in the engagement letter if they plan on doing it. Students then ought to realize that clients are less likely to be surprised or object if they make the practice of rounding up time clear from the outset.

Regardless of how each group’s time(s) and bill(s) works out, the exercise should be a valuable opportunity to teach even more facets of lawyer-client relations. After such a session, the professor could bring into class respected practitioners and ask them how they are able to keep accurate time. Most will say they developed the habit of keeping contemporaneous time records throughout the day. Perhaps these lawyers will also offer tips such as the author learned in practice about how important it is not only to keep accurate time, but also to describe one’s work thoroughly. If the client’s bill shows two-tenths of an hour and, for the description, “telephone conversation,” they likely will wonder what the telephone conversation was about. With a little more effort, the lawyer can amplify the description, e.g. “telephone conversation with opposing counsel negotiating protocol for reducing the cost on my client of producing electronic documents.” Perhaps the bill should also include some entries where the lawyer does a task of one-tenth of an hour and puts “no charge to client.” Students need to know that clients will remain happier if they can see that the time spent was meaningful and have a sense of the significance to their case. If clients see their lawyer exercising the judgment to give the client a break and not charge for every little thing, that ought to create goodwill between the lawyer and client. Happy clients tend to be ones who return when they need legal help in the future.

In short, the Piper billing scandal may hurt the credibility of more lawyers than it should. However, for those of us adapting legal education to better prepare law students and to make them more attentive to ethical concerns, the scandal may be the prompting we need to begin teaching the importance of careful time-keeping and of billing practices that may actually strengthen the lawyer-client relationship.

SALT Co-President’s Message on Proposed SRC Changes

Dear SALT Members: 

As you know SALT has been closely following the ABA Standard Review Committee’s proposed changes to the standards regulating law schools.  We wanted to alert you to the proposed revisions to Standard 405 on faculty status, academic freedom and governance.  The three alternatives under consideration are attached to this email and available at saltlaw.org.  You can also find a summary of the Committee’s discussion prepared by Board member Carol Chomsky and CLEA representative Claudia Angelos at saltlaw.org. 

In summary, Alternative A is intended to maintain the current system, although there is some disagreement on the Committee whether the current system requires schools to have a system of tenure.  Alternative B eliminates distinctions between faculty based on teaching responsibilities and requires some form of security of position but does not require tenure nor does it require that all faculty have access to tenure.  Alternative C provides that all faculty must be treated identically but would not require any form of security of position. 

We encourage you to examine the proposals, share them with your colleagues and discuss the potential impact the various alternatives would have on your school and legal education generally.  The next SRC Meeting is scheduled for April 26-27, 2013 in Washington, D.C. and Standard 405 is currently on the agenda. You can find more about the agenda at   http://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/committees/standards_review.html 

 If you are interested in submitting comments to the proposed alternatives under consideration, you can do so by emailing your letter to Becky Stretch at Becky.Stretch@americanbar.org.  If you choose to comment, SALT would also like to receive a copy of your comment.  If you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact SALT. 

We hope you find this information helpful. 

Jackie Gardina

Vermont Law School

Co-President of Society of American Law Teachers

Visit saltlaw.org to join SALT in creating justice, diversity and academic excellence.

 

Visiting Professor Santa Clara University 2012-2013

408-551-3000 x6406

View my research on my SSRN Author page: http://ssrn.com/author=338824

 

Reflections on incubators, “Lawyers for America” and post-grad “community law practice”

Almost a week ago, the New York Times featured an article on programs by some law schools to start “firms” to help with graduate placement . http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/08/education/law-schools-look-to-medical-education-model.html?pagewanted=all The NYT article triggered a chain of very thoughtful and informative e-mail comments and discussion on the clinic listserv (and I hope that some of the commentators share their thoughts again by commenting on  this post below).   Commentators carefully tried to untangle and analyze the hodge-podge of goals, concerns and ideas that were unfortunately conflated in the breezy article.

One of the issues which is often subsumed in the article and in the discussion of these projects is the potential to address inequity in access to justice in America. According to the World Justice Project’s most recent report, the United States continues to fare poorly in Rule of Law indicators when it comes to access to counsel and the difference in behavior between high and low income individuals:

“ <i>in the United States, among the low income litigants, 81% did not seek legal assistance because they felt that they could not afford the lawyer’s fees, compared to 48% of the high income litigants.”</i>

And as Gillian K. Hadfield observes in commenting on plummeting law school admissions , “We have a significant mismatch between demand and supply.” “http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/01/law-school-applications-are-collapsing-as-they-should-be/272729/

Is there promise in these “law school law firm” initiatives to address this country’s truly awful reputation on lack of access to justice?  Cathryn Miller-Wilson believes there is: “Harmonizing Current Threats: Using the Outcry for Legal Education Reforms to Take Another Look at Civil Gideon and What it Means to be an American Lawyer” http://ssrn.com/author=1896974

Others are bemused that the entire conversation appears to ignore the law firms that already exist within law schools – in-house clinics.  Is it a secret that law schools already have been focused on teaching through law firm practice since the early part of the last century?
Is the emphasis on clinics as teaching labs and the focus on the development of a student from neophyte to emerging lawyer an inconvenient fact?

Still others are angered that this emphasis on law schools running firms, especially when client fees are involved, unfairly competes with our struggling new graduates.

What do you think?

New Book Planned to follow Best Practices in Legal Education

The following post comes to us from Professor Lisa Bliss:

CLEA’s Best Practices Implementation Committee, co-chaired by Lisa Bliss and Carrie Kaas, is currently focused on developing a second volume, tentatively titled “Building on Best Practices: The Walls are Coming Down.”

Published in 2007, Best Practices in Legal Education: A Vision and A Roadmap, by Roy Stuckey and Others, was released the same year as Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law (the Carnegie Report). Both publications offered important ideas for legal education. Some viewed the Carnegie Report as the critique, and Best Practices as the answer. Both publications likewise have been often cited in conversations about legal education reform.

Following the release of Best Practices, it became a resource for law teachers. It was helpful for curriculum planning on a micro as well as a macro level. The book can be summarized as containing three major questions that legal educators should ask:

1. What is your mission?
2. What is your method?
3. What is your measure?

After a few years, it became clear that there were important topics in legal education that received little or no treatment in the original Best Practices book and that there were new developments that merited examination. The Best Practices Implementation Committee embarked on a project to identify those topics and authors to contribute to writing a follow-up book. The Co-Editors of the new book project are Deborah Maranville and Antoinette Sedillo-Lopez. The new book will differ from the original in its format and approach.

Among the topics to be addressed in the new book are the following:

Mission:
• Setting goals for the program of instruction – mission statements

Method:
• Professional Identity
• Interdisciplinary
• International
• Integration and Problem-solving
• Pro Bono
• Intercultural Competence
• Experiential
• Externships
• Technology
• Delivery of instruction

Measure:
• Assessing student learning
• Assessing institutional effectiveness

The chapters are currently being written. The authors are organized in topical committees, made up in part by volunteers who responded to a call for proposals for the new book that was issued in 2011. The co-editors are pursuing publishers for the second volume and hope to see the book published in late 2013 or 2014. If you have questions about the project, please contact Deborah Maranville at maran@uw.edu or Antoinette Sedillo Lopez at lopez@law.unm.edu. Watch for more information about this project in an upcoming CLEA newsletter.

Community Lawyering: Some Unexpected Guidance in Development

The following post comes to us from Professor Nancy Cook:

Recently there was an inquiry on the law clinic listserve seeking recommendations for good, short readings for students on the topic of community lawyering. There were some great responses, which were collected and later posted en masse by the chain’s originator, Stephen Miler. I was interested in this, not only because it’s a topic that relates to work I’ve been doing for twenty-some years, but because for the last year I have been exploring the possibilities for a law school/ community partnership here in my adopted city of Minneapolis, and this time, I’ve been documenting the process as I go along. Along the way, I’ve been educated by my own experience and by the experience, knowledge, and wisdom of others, many of whose writings appear on the list compiled via the clinic listserve. I have also discovered, however, as I’ve engaged in this ongoing documentation, that I’m equally likely to find experience, knowledge and wisdom in unexpected places. So here I share some of these less-than-obvious sources of guidance, with an invitation to you to share your own gems with me.

I should preface this with two things. First, I do not include here the actual history or events that relate to the development of our law school/ community partnership. That’s for another time. What I do want to share, however, is the definition of community lawyering that I subscribe to, since there are, without doubt, a good many variations on the theme. I quote here from a co-authored article, Conversations on “Community Lawyering”: The Newest (Oldest) Wave in Clinical Legal Education, 28 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol’y. 359, 363-365 (2008) (with Karen Tokarz, Susan Brooks, and Brenda Bratton Blom).

What are the core principles that self-identified community lawyers and community lawyering clinics have in common? First, community lawyering involves formal or informal collaborations with communities and community groups to identify and address community issues. Second, community lawyering is focused on empowering communities, promoting economic and social justice, and fostering systemic change. Implicitly, then, if not explicitly, community lawyers are invested in long-term community commitments to advance these goals. Third, the work of community lawyering clinics involves collaborative, and frequently interdisciplinary, practice. In sum, community lawyering is an approach to the practice of law and to clinical legal education that centers on building and sustaining relationships with clients, over time, in context, as part of and in conjunction with communities. It incorporates a respect for clients that empowers them and assists them in the larger economic, political, and social context of their lives, beyond their immediate legal problems. This approach contemplates a significantly different role of lawyers and clients than that in traditional law practice (and, perhaps, in traditional clinical law practice)—one in which the client community or community groups are the protagonists in framing and resolving their concerns, and lawyers act as team members, working both for and with clients.

And now, the random sources of guidance:

A Lecture on “Deafness in the Age of Cochlear Implants”
I am listening to a talk in conjunction with a university program on interdisciplinary studies. The speaker, a medical researcher, grew up hearing in a largely deaf community. She says in that community she came to understand deafness as a physical condition, not as a medical problem. Now she asks, how is it that society – including parents of the deaf — came to understand deafness as a medical problem?
She reports that in the 1990s the FDA approved the use of cochlear implants for children. Cochlear implants are surgically installed electronic devices that convert electrical sound signals into electric impulses.These stimulate nerves, which transmit the impulses to the brain and are received as sounds. The devices had already been available to adults in the United States since 1984. Once the FDA gave the go-ahead, many hearing parents signed up their deaf children for the implants. The deaf community’s protests against the FDA’s action, on grounds of ethics, identity loss, and cultural impairment, were ignored. Into the language came the word “audism,” referring to a view or belief that hearing is always to be preferred over deafness, and, relatedly, that auditory language is better than sign language.
One consequence of the shift in the treatment of deaf children is that deafness has been reframed as a processing problem, rather than a sensory difference. In other words, deafness is not a condition of not being able to hear; rather, a deaf person’s physiology is defective in its mechanical ability to take external sound and transfer it to an internal sound receptor. The problem-solving focus thus turned to auditory processing, not to processing language or to developing different channels for communicating. The shift was driven by companies that stood to profit financially from the use of implants.

Buddha Speaks
In the drawer of the table at my bedside in the hotel is a copy of book on Buddhism. Every now and then, I take a look; it’s like snacking on fortune cookies.

Awake. Be the witness of your thoughts.
No one saves us but ourselves. No one can and no one may. We ourselves must walk the path.
In every trial let understanding fight for you.
See the false as false, the true as true.
An idea that is developed and put into action is more important than an idea that only exists as an idea.
A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker.
Do what you have to do resolutely, with all your heart. The traveler who hesitates only raises dust on the road.
Better than a thousand hollow words is one word that brings peace.

The Choice
Huffington Post
Posted by Ray Errol Fox
11/03/2012 11:31 am

[O]nly four years ago at the Republican Convention, …then Democratic candidate Barack Obama was callously mocked before a national viewing audience by a mincing Rudolph Giuliani, an infantile Arnold Schwarzenegger and a vapid Sarah Palin for having been a community organizer. Was it because a college graduate devoted fifteen-hour days to the less fortunate in a Chicago public housing project for the sucker’s salary of $10,000 annually?

… In 1985, Barack Obama moved from New York City, where he was employed as a financial consultant, to Chicago to work with local churches organizing job training and other programs for 5,300 poor and working-class residents who lived “amid shuttered steel mills, a nearby landfill, a putrid sewage treatment plant.” Michelle Obama pronounced it “a defining moment in his life, not just his career.” Announcing his presidential bid in 2007, candidate Obama said, “It was in these neighborhoods that I received the best education I ever had.” [It] “taught me a lot about listening to people as opposed to coming in with a predetermined agenda.” He insisted on “staying in the background while he empowered us,” says a woman who worked with him.

….Obama acknowledges he had few big victories to celebrate and only small, hard-won successes to cite. “But whether it was getting the city to fill potholes, provide summer jobs, or remove asbestos from the apartments or persuading the apartment managers to repair toilets, pipes, and ceilings, Obama encouraged residents to come up with their own priorities with the gentle admonition: “It’s your community.”

….What I learned from Obama’s considerable writings is: community organizers encourage people to be better individuals by coming together; their goal is to motivate others to work for the communal good; they let others think for themselves and form the conclusions that impact their lives.

Overheard at an Environmental Writers Retreat
– What is the best part of a natural disaster?
– Fear is easier to evoke than hope.
– De Toqueville tells us there are two major principles driving people in the US: the ruthless individual pursuit of private wealth, and an impulse to attend to the common good.
– We are all nine meals away from murder.

Two Truths and a Lie
Tonight a group of about twelve is gathering around a table at a local restaurant to celebrate a departing VISTA volunteer’s many contributions to her host organization, give her grief, and wish her well. I am among those who will miss her. A recent law school graduate, she has been a regular and supportive guide, helping to navigate and interpret as I’ve explored the Northside community.
In the relaxed atmosphere tonight, I listen to stories, get a feel for how people interact with each other, learn some history, measure attitudes. A drink or two into the conversation, a community outreach director, suggests an “activity,” a game. After a short discussion, we settle on “Two Truths and a Lie.” We go around the table and each person in turn makes three assertions about themselves, two of them factually correct and one false. I learn some pretty interesting things about my colleagues. I get some insight into how the outreach director operates.

from the Poets
So much is unfolding that must
complete its gesture

So much is in bud.
(Denise Levertov, Beginners)

There’s a thread you follow. It goes among
things that change. But it doesn’t change.
(William Stafford, The Way It Is)