Cultural Knowledge, Intercultural Communication and Self Awareness

I have posted several blogs about ideas involving intercultural communication, cultural knowlege and self awareness.    At the risk of engaging in shameless self-promotion, I would like to announce that my article on these issues just came out as part of the Wash U. Symposium on “Emerging Directions in Clinical Legal Education” ( I know many call these ideas “cultural competence”, but if you read my article you will know why I eschew that terminology…) Continue reading

Best Practices Blog Authors To Present at University of Maryland School of Law

Dean Antoinette Sedillo Lopez and Professor Peter Joy are scheduled to present at the University of Maryland School of Law conference entitled “Curriculum Reform:  Linking Policy and Practice.”  This conference is scheduled for March 6 & 7, 2008.  The conference promises to highlight innovative legal education programs from around the country that were created in response to the Best Practices for Legal Education text.  Continue reading

Be Careful What You Wish For

So I’m probably the only one who missed this interesting development in the ongoing saga of reform of the ABA Standards for the Approval of Law Schools. There has been much hoo-ha and concern about the Special Committee Reports on Security of Position and Outcome Measures, but did you know: in August 2008, the Standards Review Committee of the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar circulated for notice and comment two proposed changes to the Standards, one of which is to delete Interpretations 402-1 and 402-2 relating to student-faculty ratio. (The proposed changes are published on the Section’s website, www.abanet.org/legaled.) Continue reading

Use the Best Practices Book to Educate Dean Search Committees

Last week, I received a request for 12 copies of the Best Practices book.  When I asked why the person needed the books, he replied that he wanted to give a copy to each member of his school’s dean search committee.

I think this is a very good idea.  Armed with the book, search committee members can determine whether dean applicants are informed about current issues in legal education.  They can also evaluate whether candidates have a vision for improving the educational quality of a school or would, instead, prefer to maintain the status quo. 

If you would like copies for your dean search committee, send me an email at stuckeyroy@gmail.com.  There is no charge for the books, but we will ask you to pay postage/shipping costs.

Practicing Lawyers in the Classroom Special Bonus Edition: Free Passion!

Like many others, I have incorporated practicing lawyers and judges into the classroom over the years in a variety of contexts.  This semester I had an especially rewarding experience with a guest speaker in my Public Interest Law and Social Welfare course (fka Poverty Law).  Of course, I try to only invite folks into my classroom when I think they have something valuable to deliver.  I have rarely been disappointed, although some speakers naturally are more entertaining than others while delivering their information.  This semester was different.  I have never had such an overwhelmingly positive response to a speaker before.  It was thrilling.  Who inspired this kind of reaction?    More importantly, can it be duplicated??? 

 

            I invited a practicing legal aid lawyer to speak to my class.  This lawyer has worked for legal aid for 40 years, and has been on the cutting edge of litigation and advocacy to save the homes of low income people.  He is a national expert on the subject of predatory mortgage lending practices and has testified before congress.  He is doing amazing work on behalf of poor people.  He arrived with a luggage cart full of handouts, and talked for an hour and a half about predatory lending, sometimes skipping around from topic to topic.  He ran over time.  Was the information he had presented in a linear fashion?  No.  Was it easy to follow?  Not always.  What was so great about it?  His passion.  Everyone in the room felt it.  After his presentation, a number of students stayed to introduce themselves and to thank him for coming.  Several students came to see me to tell me how much they enjoyed his visit.  Many sent emails saying things like, “the best class I have ever had in law school,” “best guest speaker ever,” or “I am considering going into this area of law now.”

 

            This experience demonstrates a couple of ideas related to Best Practices:  helping law graduates nurture their quality of life and integrating practicing lawyers into the program of instruction.  These are not easy tasks, and the goals can be achieved in a multitude of ways.  However, I learned this fall that showing students living, breathing examples of lawyers who have found meaningful, satisfying work in the law helps them identify possibilities for their own careers.  I would love to hear examples of ways that others have incorporated practicing lawyers and the concept of quality of life into their classrooms.

Collaboration and the Development of Best Practices for Legal Education

The Midwest Clinical Conference was held in Bloomington, Indiana  at Indiana University School of Law last week.  (Terrific conference, by the way…well organized and very vibrant presentations).   Kudos to Julia Lamber, Amy Applegate, Carwina Weng, and the rest of the Indiana clinical faculty for hosting! The theme of the conference was “Building Bridges: Creating Clinical Opportunities through Collaboration”…and I got to give a keynote speech!  I mentioned the best practices project in the speech because I thought it was a wonderful example of a collaborative project.  Here is an excerpt:

The Best Practices book, you will notice, is authored by Roy Stuckey “and others”.  Roy did this because he said had lost track of the many individuals who attended meetings, wrote sections and gave comments and suggestions in the development of that important book.    He had the idea, Carrie Kaas and Peter Joy were president and vice president of the Clinical Legal Education association when they named him chair of the project.  Roy  recruited many others–law professors and individuals from other disciplines– to read  and comment on drafts and to write sections.  Vanessa Merton hosted a two day conference on the manuscript at Pace law school.  At every AALS and clinic meeting, he hosted a meeting to talk about a section or a chapter.  People came and went, but they left their ideas along the way.   When he learned about the Carnegie Report in development, he did not view them as competition, he viewed them as potential allies and worked with the authors.  They cross cited each other.   The result is the publication of two important books on transforming legal education and many ambassadors for transforming legal education.   And, the collaboration he encouraged inspired Mary Lynch and Carrie Kaas to head the Best Practices Implementation Committee  which collaborates to give presentations about Best Practices, blog about Best Practices and thus document and influence the  best practices movement.  And this movement will transform legal education!

For more information about the conference check out the conference materials  on the Indiana University Conference Website:  http://www.mclc.indiana.edu/

THE ELECTION AND BEST PRACTICES

For many of us in the United States, these past 24 hours have been filled with emotion.  We experienced the  most inclusive voting in our country’s history, the election of the first African American president, the power of a people’s movement and the promise of change in the midst of very difficult times.  We recalled the struggles of people who fought for and waited long for change to “come to America”.  

As the cameras focused on Grant Park last night, they showed us an ideal:  a beautiful, joyful tapestry of our sister and fellow citizens of all ages, races, colors, national origin, sexual orientation,  with or without disability celebrating peacefully a non-violent transfer of power.   Those in Grant Park listened to John McCain’s most gracious concession speech which called upon all Americans not only to support President-elect Obama  but to honor the need to celebrate this historic moment. 

I have to admit the first thing on my mind has not been Best Practices.  And yet, as law professors and law students, we know that moments of cultural and political and global change demand new ways to think about and teach and learn law.   What does this moment mean for us?

I offer two thoughts.  First, more than ever, we need to acknowledge that laws, legal systems and law practice will change and adapt to the multi-racial America that we aspire to be.  This multi-racial identity is not only about demographic statistics, it is a way of being in the world and relating to that world.  In other words, it may be time to flesh out more broadly Best Practices call to teach cultural competence and to acknowledge the remaining cultural challenges to de facto equality under the law. 

Second, I suggest that the election informed us about the nature of the young people we are teaching and who we will be teaching over the coming years.   This is an engaged generation, reminiscent of those who changed legal education in the 1960’s but with a uniquely 21st century identity.  Like in the 1960’s, droves of college students and twenty-somethings fueled voter registration campaigns and made a major difference in the outcome of the Democratic primary.  However, this generation also uses technology in ways that are disciplined and playful.  The web technology used by the Obama campaign and “MoveON” organized volunteers nationally, replacing local phonebanking sites with savvy computerized programs which enabled volunteers to conduct and organize campaign work from their homes.  On the Republican side, young conservatives were responsbile for websites such as  “Draft Sarah Palin” long before the rest of us ever heard of Wasilla or “field dressing a moose. ” Finally, this generation follows through, disproving the pundits who warned that  “young people” would not actually vote in great numbers. 

As educators, the lesson of the election may well be that our teaching, likewise, needs to be engaged, technologically savvy, disciplined, playful and have follow through – just as Best Practices advises.  And so, what I take away from this election is joy not only in the historic moment for my country but joy in anticipating and welcoming into the classroom and into the law clinics this new and exciting generation.

First Year Practicum Course

My colleague Jenny Moore permitted me to post this course description for Practicum.  She, Alfred Mathewson and  Sergio Pareja are each teaching one section of First Year Contracts.    The Practicum is a one credit course connected to  Contracts.  Here is her description: 

University of New Mexico School of Law Practicum course (Fall 2008)   

 

OVERVIEW:  The goal of the first year year Practicum is to give our students a chance to begin to develop their practical lawyering skills as well as their ethical and professional sensibilities alongside the analytical skills they are honing in their doctrinal courses.  We chose to link Practicum to Contracts, one of our three first semester doctrinal courses, so that we could develop hypothetical exercises that built upon a particular substantive law foundation, and so that three professors could collaborate closely in teaching the course.  Thus we created a “paper client,” Elaine Lobato, who is involved in an employment contract dispute, and we generated various practice-related exercises designed to help students think in practical ways about client representation. 

 

    MOORE section (please note that the other sections incorporated some of these elements as well, or generated their own exercises and assignments):

 

    This section of Practicum regularly broke into small groups, either two groups of 20 students, or three groups of 13.  These groups were led by the instructor, her 2L teaching assistant and invited guest facilitators, including other faculty and staff members.

 

    Hypothetical exercises:

 

    1.  The first exercise was a mock interview of the client, Elaine Lobato (played by a 3L student actor) by her attorney, Atticus Finch (a 2L actor).  Our Practicum students observed the interview, and then were given the opportunity to ask the client additional questions to help draw out the factual basis for her potential claim.  This first exercise focused on the importance of building a trust relationship with the client, as well as thorough fact development. 

    2.  Second, the students were asked to draft a letter to Ms. Lobato, as her potential attorney, offering to represent her and clearly defining the scope of representation.  This second exercise focused on the need to clearly define the issues and the role that the attorney is taking on, whether initial research, negotiations, filing a law suit, defense against a particular law suit or law suits, etc. 

    3.  The third assignment asked the students to draft a letter from Ms. Lobato to the local Board of Education, in which she sought to accept an offer of employment.  This third exercise focused on the importance of careful drafting, to ensure that the various elements of an agreement are present, including essential terms.

    4.  The fourth assignment then required the students to analyze Ms. Lobato’s letter to the Board of Education and other related communications in terms of the validity of the writings under the Statute of Frauds.  This exercise was designed to help students apply common law and statutory requirements to a particular set of facts, and to develop creative legal strategies for seeking a particular outcome.

 

    In addition to these four skills-based exercises, this year’s Practicum gave our students the opportunity to attend presentations by lawyers working in various fields, and to ask them questions about their career experiences.  One attorney talked about the case of Delgado v. Phelps Dodge, a wrongful death case that she ultimately brought to the New Mexico Supreme Court, which served to narrow the scope of employer immunity from tort liability for workplace injury.  Another attorney will speak with our students about his commercial and tort-related practice, encompassing transactional work, as well as the defense of catastrophic injury and medical malpractice claims.  Finally, our students attended a lecture by Sian Elias, Chief Justice of the New Zealand Supreme Court, who spoke about the rights of indigenous people from a comparative law perspective.  Her lecture was of considerable relevance to our students interested in concentrating in the field of Indian Law as well as those whose New Mexico practice will require an understanding of the interrelationships between Indian law, state law, federal law and regional/international law.

 

    Finally, Practicum has created several opportunities for students to think about the practice of law in a broader human context.  One of the sections developed a mini “Law and Literature” unit, in which students selected a work of fiction or non-fiction grappling with justice issues in a particular historical or cultural setting.  Students selected among three books — A Lesson Before Dying, by Ernest Gaines, looking at issues of race and criminal justice; The Welsh Girl, by Peter Ho Davies, revolving around a German POW camp in a Welsh town during the Second World War; and Benjamin Cardozo’s Nature of the Judicial Process, reflecting on the historical evolution of legal precedent.  Before the semester is out, our students will have the opportunity to reflect on their own career goals, and the ways in which they hope to engage their values in the practice of law. 

 

 

Best Practices and Math for Lawyers

 I have been getting some feedback from members of the bar that recent graduates are not as savvy about math and accounting as they have been in the past.  I was assured it was not just UNM graduates, but it made me think about the recommendation in Best Practices to prepare students for the practice of law  and that law schools should develop a curriculum relevant to that goal.   HMMM…math is pretty important to the practice of law…and I teach Family Law, which involves a LOT of math…in reviewing and presenting budgets, in allocating property, in figuring out pension divisions, in calculating child support and alimony.  I realized that I don’t specifically list accuracy in math calculations and understanding of the mathematical principles underlying the legal issues on my list of learning objectives on my syllabus.   That is going to change… 

This semester, I told my students that the final examination will have at least one problem requiring substantial mathematical calculations.  They may take their calculator into the exam (otherwise it is closed book).    And, I am spending a little more time giving them math related problems (e.g. pension allocation, child support, etc) to work on as homework or in small group and I am spending  a little more class time discussing them.   I look forward to seeing how they do on the exam!

Bar Passage and Best Practices for Legal Education

My colleague Alfred Mathewson always makes me think.  He came back from the American Bar Association  Bar Exam Passage conference last week.  He had attended the Crossroads conference at the University of Washington too.  He had some interesting observations.  He said there were several schools that were creating “tracks” for students in the lower end of the class rank to focus them very specifically on legal analysis skills.  Continue reading

Interactive Assessment Program at the AALS Annual Meeting

I am really excited about moderating and serving as commentator of the second session of the Joint Program sponsored by the Clinical and Professional Responsibility Sections to be held in San Diego on Wednesday, January 7.   It is on assessment and is going to be very interactive.  At the International Clinical Conference this summer, I had the distinct pleasure of meeting Professor Kevin Kerrigan and Dean Philip Plowden of Northumbia who were the organizers of the conference in Cork, Ireland. (I discussed this in an earlier post, “Two American Keynotes.” )  The plan for the AALS session will involve how they assess learning across the law school curriculum in the UK, and they plan to involve the group in an interactive assessment exercise.  They will ask the group to use a criteria-referenced protocol used at Northumbria.  I have blogged about how important it is to measure students learning by their performance with regard to a specific desired outcome rather than simply ranking them against each other, so I am very interested in seeing how a group of clinicians will use the protocol.  And, Lawrence Grosberg of New York Law School will discuss  multiple assessment methods in clinical and skills courses  as a result of his work using of “standardized clients”.  He will involve the group in an interactive assessment exercise.   Since I have been working with the  UNM Medical School using standardized clients in joint training about domestic violence, I have very interested in seeing how Professor Grosberg’s assessment techniques have developed.  I get to play “Oprah” and get the audience involved and hopefully in my best “Oprah like” way ask provocative and interesting questions!  And, if you have been following my posts, you know that I am very interested in the impact of outcome based assessment on law students of color.  My theory is that clearly articulating learning outcomes and evaluating the extent to which students acheive those objectives will benefit all students.   And, I hope that measuring performance on criteria referenced objectives will prove to be a much better way of evaluating students rather than ranking them against each other on their performance of the same skills that they demonstrated on the Law School Admissions Test.  And, true to a foundational principle of clinical teaching…this session will not involve “talking heads”…we will all learn by doing! 

11th Annual Northwest Clinical Conference: On Assessment

Wish you all could have been there for the 11th Annual Northwest Clinical Conference at the beautiful Sleeping Lady Conference Center outside Leavenworth in Washington’s Cascade Mountains. Our topic?  A central Best Practices issue:  Assessment. Continue reading

What do clinics have to do with US News & World Report? The unfortunate answer is “not much”

If it’s fall, then the US News & World Report law school rankings ballots are arriving in law professor mailboxes everywhere. More specifically, clinic directors are receiving the separate clinical specialty ballots (as are teachers of the other separate specialty rankings), and four members of every law school faculty will get the annual “peer assessment” survey, the results of which constitute a whooping 25% of each school’s score for the OVERALL and most influential ranking. Continue reading

Best Practices Makes The Chronicle

Thanks to our friends at the Clinicians With Not Enough To Do blog for finding this:

Print: Due Processors: Educators Seek a Digital Upgrade for Teaching Law – Chronicle.com

By PETER MONAGHAN
Seattle

In 1871, Christopher Columbus Langdell, a prominent jurist who had joined the law faculty at Harvard University, hit on the idea of compiling thick, imposing “casebooks” with hundreds of appeals-court rulings on particular areas of law–contracts, constitutional law, torts, and other areas. Continue reading

Mark Your Calendars for the 2009 AALS Workshop on Clinical Legal Education

From Jane Spinak:

Dear Colleagues,
On behalf of the workshop committee, I am sending a brief description of the May workshop so that you can start planning your trip soon. We will be issuing RFPs in October for the two concurrent sessions that are being planned and for organizing the affinity group meetings described below. We will also be soliciting those musicians and singers among us who want to organize some of our musical activities. The Directors Day (May 5) is also being organized and we will have more information on that soon. We’re very excited about the collaborative work we’ve been doing with our clinical colleagues in Cleveland who have been extraordinarily helpful in drawing in some remarkable participants for the plenaries and in planning fun events. We hope to see many of you in Cleveland in May!
Jane Continue reading